http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080910/ap_on_el_pr/ron_paul_third_parties
Paul says he turned down appeal to endorse McCain
By SUZANNE GAMBOA, Associated Press Writer 22 minutes ago
WASHINGTON - Republican Rep. Ron Paul, the libertarian-leaning Texas lawmaker who attracted a devoted following in the GOP primaries, said Wednesday he rejected an appeal to endorse John McCain’s presidential bid.
Paul said the request came from Phil Gramm, the former McCain adviser and ex-senator whom the campaign jettisoned after he said the country was a “nation of whiners” about the economy. Gramm defeated Paul in the Republican primary for the Senate in 1984.
Speaking to reporters at a news conference, Paul said Gramm called him this week and told him, “You need to endorse McCain.” The Texas congressman said he refused.
“The idea was that he would do less harm than the other candidate,” Paul said.
Paul won no primaries in the Republican nomination contest but developed a strong following on the Internet.
He appeared at a news conference with three third-party candidates: independent Ralph Nader; former Georgia Democratic Rep. Cynthia McKinney, the Green Party candidate; and Chuck Baldwin, the Constitution Party candidate. Bob Barr, the Libertarian candidate, was invited but said at his own news conference later that he declined because Paul didn’t endorse one candidate.
“We need today, now, 55 days before this election, bold, focused, specific leadership and that is not the amorphous kind that says any of the above or none of the above,” Barr said.
Barr said he had asked Paul to join him as his running mate on the Libertarian Party ticket while his current running mate, Wayne Root would step aside. “We don’t anticopate that he will,” Barr said.
Earlier, Paul called the presidential elections a charade and said voters are faced with the “lesser of two evils.”
The majority of Americans, about 60 percent, are unhappy with their choices in the race, Paul said. He urged the three third-party candidates to bring all their supporters together to vote against the “establishment candidates.”
Paul, 73, a former doctor, ran for president as the Libertarian candidate in 1988. He is unopposed in the November race for his congressional seat.
Nader derided media focus on what he called “lipstickgate,” referring to the bickering between the McCain and Barack Obama campaigns over whether a phrase used by Obama was a sexist comment against Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin.
Nader, a consumer protection advocate, acknowledged differences among the third-party candidates such as government regulation of health and safety standards. But he added that he shares Paul’s support for more opportunity in the political process for third-party candidates.
Dontcha just LOVE Republikan stupidity?
BlueJuliet — Ron Paul IS a Republican. He is a REPUBLICAN Congressman from Texas.
It’s just that unlike the neoconservatives who have hijacked the Republican Party and turned it into «Die Nationalen Christlichen Republikanischen Weißen Partei
der Leute für Gott und Land», Ron Paul actually happens to take the U.S. Constitution *seriously* — and we liberals actually *respect* that!
Debbie
Mail this post
Posted under Consumer Protection
This post was written by admin on December 28, 2008


Joyce
I think the “good ol boys” party had better start learning a new dance as the Democrats could possibly in the “da house” come November. Ron Paul is in a position where he doesn’t need to buckle under to anyone. Good for him.
Antonio
I think whoever asked for Ron Paul’s endorsement is a moron. What is the point? So that Ron Paul’s 15 fans will vote for McCain? I would rather not have Ron Paul’s brainwashed parade of morons associated with McCain at all - they could end up giving him a bad name.
Holly
I think that the AP article doesn’t tell the whole story. Being that the AP is a tool of the democratic party, they pointedly omitted the reason why Ron Paul turned down the request to endorse McCain.
Isn’t it obvious? Paul is a hard-line Libertarian. He doesn’t agree with Republican politics. Why should he endorese McCain? He said himself, the election is for the “lesser of two evils” in his opinion. There’s no way he’s going to endorse EITHER candidate.
Besides that, Paul isn’t happy with Gramm, who beat him in a hard-fought contest for a senate seat in 1984, over which there is bad blood still today.